<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Four Categories of Problems with AGRA</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.seattleglobaljustice.org/2008/06/agra-watch-blog-post/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.seattleglobaljustice.org/2008/06/agra-watch-blog-post/</link>
	<description>Working Locally for Justice in the Global Economy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 07:28:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Margherita Pagni</title>
		<link>http://www.seattleglobaljustice.org/2008/06/agra-watch-blog-post/comment-page-1/#comment-2251</link>
		<dc:creator>Margherita Pagni</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Dec 2010 19:20:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seattleglobaljustice.org/?p=23#comment-2251</guid>
		<description>THANK YOU,THANK YOU, THANK YOU!

It is high time someone challenged the reductionist and biased approaches to grant making for AG by large foundations. like Gates--I hope others will follow.  

How do these big foundations shape their thinking on the subject? Who do they listen to, and who do they NOT listen to? 
I also hope they create advisory committees of people who have already done their research homework and who can advise the, at the very least, where to look for evidence.

And what a lame response from the Gates spokesperson &quot;no one has a silver bullet&quot;.  As if the cliche can obscure the fact the we already know what doesn&#039;t work.  If it doesn&#039;t work here, how can it possibly work in Africa?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>THANK YOU,THANK YOU, THANK YOU!</p>
<p>It is high time someone challenged the reductionist and biased approaches to grant making for AG by large foundations. like Gates&#8211;I hope others will follow.  </p>
<p>How do these big foundations shape their thinking on the subject? Who do they listen to, and who do they NOT listen to?<br />
I also hope they create advisory committees of people who have already done their research homework and who can advise the, at the very least, where to look for evidence.</p>
<p>And what a lame response from the Gates spokesperson &#8220;no one has a silver bullet&#8221;.  As if the cliche can obscure the fact the we already know what doesn&#8217;t work.  If it doesn&#8217;t work here, how can it possibly work in Africa?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

